skilletosis
02-13-2005, 02:50 PM
earlier today I posted in the creation/evolution thread. The wierd thing is when I posted the previous post was #283 by skynes. Mine was in sequence after his as was the fact that I was adding to the thought of post #283. But now that I'm looking at the thread again there's a post in between mine and #283. Am I nuts (don't answer that) or is there now some sort of drag, delay, or pre-approval of posts by those unregistered guests?
amodman
02-13-2005, 08:29 PM
Someone probably hit submit reply before you...
disciple
02-13-2005, 08:32 PM
I remember reading that all Unregistered posts must be approved by a mod...
So perhaps the Unregistered replied before you, but got approved after you posted.
skilletosis
02-13-2005, 08:39 PM
I remember reading that all Unregistered posts must be approved by a mod...
So perhaps the Unregistered replied before you, but got approved after you posted.
I knew it was being considered but hadn't heard whether it was decided upon.
unshakeable15
02-20-2005, 01:55 PM
yup, it's official. unregistereds need have their posts approved before they show up. :)
skilletosis
02-23-2005, 09:12 AM
thanks Mike, I knew something was up and I couldn't just be crazy... this time at least...
PinkGoo
03-07-2005, 06:47 AM
hey about posting.... i tend to post alot each day. i mean, is it rude to post as many posts as i do so that when the next person gets online all the threads have been flooded by me and my posts?? i dont normally post again on the same thread until another person answers, but i do go to almost every active thread and post. is that ok or does it bother anyone??
There's nothing wrong with being very active on the boards if what you say is relevant to the particular conversation.
skilletosis
03-07-2005, 09:46 AM
relevance is especially important in The Hill. That would be the only place where irrelevance would annoy me (like that matters...lol). You may blab with relevance all you want. :) :)
PinkGoo
03-07-2005, 10:11 AM
yea, playing nice in The Hill is important
relevance is especially important in The Hill. That would be the only place where irrelevance would annoy me (like that matters...lol). You may blab with relevance all you want. :) :)
while it is especially true that topics on The Hill should stay focused, I don't want to inadvertently send the message that this is the only board we're concerned about... if you're contributing to the conversation, then that's fine. But we have had members in the past go down and post something in every thread, even if it was nothing more than a " :) " or " lol " or whatever.... that, we don't like.
PinkGoo
03-08-2005, 06:03 AM
no, i only post short in "Pointless Posts"... and even there it is usually at least full sentance.
unshakeable15
03-09-2005, 11:51 AM
good. fragments. no good here.
;)
vBulletin® v3.6.5, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.