NightCrawler
05-07-2007, 01:25 PM
There are varying definitions of knowledge. What are the criteria for us to know something?
René Descartes (the father of modern philosophy) suggested that knowledge (now known as 'Cartesian knowledge') must fit the following requirements:
1) One must believe it
2) It must be true (it must be reality)
3) There is no reason to doubt otherwise
Naturally, Descartes has ushered in a movement called Solipsism almost by accident, which simply believes that one cannot know if other minds are actually conscious. For example, I know I am a thinking person. But how do I know you are? I must believe it, it must be true, and I should have no reason to doubt it. But I have at least one reason to doubt if you are a thinking being, so I cannot know (in the strict sense) that you are a thinking being like myself.
I'd like to hear everyone's definitions of knowledge, and some good healthy critiques will be highly appreciated from peers.
[Disclaimer: most people claim to know something when they may be wrong.]
René Descartes (the father of modern philosophy) suggested that knowledge (now known as 'Cartesian knowledge') must fit the following requirements:
1) One must believe it
2) It must be true (it must be reality)
3) There is no reason to doubt otherwise
Naturally, Descartes has ushered in a movement called Solipsism almost by accident, which simply believes that one cannot know if other minds are actually conscious. For example, I know I am a thinking person. But how do I know you are? I must believe it, it must be true, and I should have no reason to doubt it. But I have at least one reason to doubt if you are a thinking being, so I cannot know (in the strict sense) that you are a thinking being like myself.
I'd like to hear everyone's definitions of knowledge, and some good healthy critiques will be highly appreciated from peers.
[Disclaimer: most people claim to know something when they may be wrong.]